| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 |
141. RR Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Personally I think the change is good. God forbid we might actually have to change our tactics to adjust for the mechanic. Also it provides a greater incentive to bring support EWAR to reduce the damage taken by logistics, rather than a straight...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.27 14:27:00
|
142. Do we want the new graphics upgrade? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MotherMoon wrote: Arakazzi wrote: Not sure. If they where going to do it they should of done it when DX11 first came out. Now that DX11 is comming to the end of it's lifespan by the time they release it, it may be a little late. Perhaps CCP ...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.27 00:05:00
|
143. Orbital Bombardment Discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ibn Taymiyyah wrote: There's two key points missing in all this. Where and why! I'm assuming OB will only be possible in Low/null/wh space. TL;DR; PI isn't all that valuable to justify all this conflict. There wont be that much fighting unles...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.26 22:48:00
|
144. Orbital Bombardment Discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A few things I would like to see with Orbital Bombardment: 1. Bombardment seige module - 2-5 minute cooldown - don't make it ship specific but rather have a fairly high CPU requirement, so you could have some novelty fits with stacked Co-Processo...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.26 19:51:00
|
145. Do we want the new graphics upgrade? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Definitely - YES!
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.26 14:26:00
|
146. Fanfest: Factional Warfare - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm not fond of the datacore idea, and would much rather have them focus on direct warfare related rewards such as additional navy frigates, destroyers, cruisers, battlecruisers, etc. The FW missions should scale a bit better too, right now it's...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.26 14:23:00
|
147. ATI Blown out of the water - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nothing to see here. The GTX680 is a good card, and I will be picking one up shortly, but this graph is utter garbage. The methods used to get those numbers are dubious at best and don't reflect the real-world difference between the cards. I wou...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.26 14:13:00
|
148. Nvidia & CCP bedpals... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ender Karazaki wrote: Klandi wrote: T' Elk wrote: Lolnvidia Noteworthy quote from forum warrior ... NOT before everyone comes in with ...hundreds of threads on same, why another - I want to know what CCP will be using to give us an in...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.26 13:27:00
|
149. Wooo! Lowsec is going to thrive now - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think I speak for most of the other -10 players by stating that I would welcome the opportunity to entertain someone looking to increase their sec status. Honestly, I don't think this will make much of a difference, since the biggest factor ke...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.22 21:01:00
|
150. Multi Account PC Build - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Uncle Jessy wrote: the gf has tasked me with the challenge of building her a pc that can actually run turetts and all brackets with 15 accounts, she is currently running a; 6 core 3.4 AMD Pehnom Black 2 (never gets past 40% with 8 accounts) 16...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.22 19:01:00
|
151. Lowsec'ing a high sec system by force YARR - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
mxzf wrote: Why? What good does this do for the game as a whole? I'm not really seeing anything here other than "I want to screw with people in highsec by turning it into lowsec". I'm just not seeing any redeeming qualities at all. The main...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.21 14:59:00
|
152. Lowsec'ing a high sec system by force YARR - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I would like to see dynamic system security ratings as well. But I think balancing it would pretty tough - since you really want the mechanic to be a push/pull between high-sec and low-sec parties. The problem is, the high-sec parties tend to be a...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.21 14:17:00
|
153. Merge Gyro Stabilizer, Heat Sink, Magnetic Field Stabilizer, and Ballistic Contr... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hannott Thanos wrote: We all know projectiles are way OP because of the huge bonus they get from the falloff bonus. This is a pretty big assumption. And actually, pulse lasers with scorch tend to have a better effective range, and you can d...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.20 19:33:00
|
154. Overheating Problem on Vid Card - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is a very troublesome problem indeed. Perhaps you would like to switch with me in New Jersey, and I'll take on your burdens in frightful Maui. Seriously, 80C isn't too much to worry about for a GPU. There are a couple options that aren't too...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.20 15:51:00
|
155. Whats the deal with stealth bombers and PVP-novice? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Because they see the big DPS totals on a frigate, and don't take into account the silly amounts of damage reduction that sig and speed play on torps.
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.20 14:24:00
|
156. Sticky:Proposed laser turret naming changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tobiaz wrote: [bittervet] Was there a topic like this before CCP changed the missiles too? Because I would LOVE to read all the comments of the community about it being a bad idea, not making it more clearer AT ALL. Complaints about ret-connin...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.20 13:38:00
|
157. Help needed: logistic PVP support? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Logistics is good and all, but I wouldn't discount the various ewar options in a support role. In particular long range webs/scrams/neuts, tracking disruptors, and ECM (dampeners can be ok depending on the other ships that are flown). The curse is...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.20 13:23:00
|
158. Sticky:Proposed laser turret naming changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Perhaps it would be better to get away from the who relative naming scheme and go with something similar to the projectile and rail weapons. For instance: Small Pulse Lasers: 100 mW Light Pulse Laser (gatling pulse) 150 mW Light Pulse Laser (cur...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.19 21:16:00
|
159. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
@Hans: An easy request on behalf of FW - the show info option for FW alliances should list their FW affiliation just as it's displayed next to a corp's logo.
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.16 20:09:00
|
160. Navy-issue Destroyers and Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Leto Aramaus wrote: mxzf wrote: Why? What role would this fill? I don't see it doing anything more than replicating ships that are already out there. Ya' know... you "why, what role is that for" people make me sick. What role does ANY n...
- by Fidelium Mortis - at 2012.03.15 17:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |